“Lame-men’s” terms
Another one. I simply must stop reading the Sunday paper. This Sunday’s “People” section highlights yet another brilliant 16-year-old who has already in her few years done more than the average successful adult. She is the only finalist in MA in the Intel Science Talent Search. I’d give you the name of her research topic, but it’s too complex to write out, never mind understand. Her Wellesley High School science teacher got it right when he said, “It’s hard to translate into laymen’s terms.” You think? I can’t help wondering if he meant “laymen” or “lame men.”
Sometimes it does feel like being really smart isn’t enough anymore. Now you need to be stratospherically smart, do good works in the community (which our Intel finalist does in spades), and have straight white teeth (as the photo indicates that she also seems to have in spades).
I get increasingly tense as I read the article in bed. “Listen to this,” I say to my husband, happily reading the book review and unaware of the black cloud heading our way. I read him the particulars, and end with the ominous line, “She hopes to attend either MIT or CalTech in the fall.” Lordy. How do we compete with this? My husband reminds me gently that we are not the ones competing. That this is A**’s gig, not ours. Much as my competitive side wants to spring into action, to go online and research the Intel program, to e-mail his math and science teachers and push them to give him more opportunities, I quell the urge. My husband is right when he shrugs his shoulders and says that our son is who he is. We should celebrate it, rather than try to force him to be something different. He’s right. I know he’s right. I vow to remember this, but just to be safe, I also vow to cancel my subscription to the Sunday “Globe.”